Over 300 Healthcare leaders from around the nation recently submitted their top of mind questions during our webinar Evidence-Based Practices that Link Accountability to Service, Quality and Profitability. Heres what they want to know:
1. Why Should an Organization Hardwire Systems of Accountability?
Through our work with hundreds of healthcare facilities and direct observation and research of high-performing organizations, Baptist Leadership Group (BLG) has identified an integrated structure of five essential areas organizations should focus on to achieve and sustain desired outcomes, The Keys to Performance Excellence. The Keys to Performance Excellence can help an organization unlock the door to organizational excellence through execution. The keys consist of:
- Hardwire Success through Systems of Accountability
- Continuously Develop High Performing Leaders
- Commit to Exceptional Customer Service
- Select, Retain, and Develop High Performing Employees
- Create and Maintain a High Performing Culture
The essential first key BLG recommends be implemented is to Hardwire Success through Systems of Accountability for the achievement of desired outcomes. The most effective way of Hardwiring Systems of Accountability, to create a culture of achievement and execution, is through the adoption of a leader performance evaluation system. Leader performance evaluation systems are designed to focus on outcomes and not processes, which is essential to creating an organization of owners. Many organizations have evaluation systems in place that allow leaders who do not meet defined goals, to receive good evaluations in their organization. This process does not and will not establish long-term success in any organization.
When an organizations leadership team and employees become owners and are aware of who is responsible for achieving results, they are more motivated to reach and exceed goals. At BLG, we define two kinds of accountability that are essential to the creation of a leader performance system that drives outcomes; The Whats and The Hows.
The Whats are defined as the objective, individual measurable outcome metrics aligned with the annual goals of the organization. The Hows are defined as the personal, day-to-day observable behaviors essential to achieve the goals of the organization. The objective is to provide you with guidelines for developing and writing effective goals (Whats) and establishing clearly defined behaviors (Hows) to create clarity of expectations with a focus on outcomes that are managed across the organization with similar consistency and predetermined consequences.
2. How do I know if my organization's evaluation process is designed to create and sustain organizational excellence?
Every healthcare organization has strategies, goals, and values, and they are all pretty good. This is not the issue. The number one opportunity is not developing goals and values, but rather using them to create and sustain organizational excellence. If an organization desires to be successful for their patients, employees, physicians, and community, it must first narrow the focus of the organization each year with a balanced approach (Baptist's Pillars - People, Service, Quality, Finance, and Growth) on 10 - 12 outcome-based organizational results, have zero-tolerance for noncompliance and poor performance (outcomes and behaviors), and establish predetermined consequences, both positive and negative, for all key success factors of the organization.
Once an organization commits to moving away from a culture of effort and creating a culture of outcomes, each leader needs to establish 4 - 8 goals that are consistent with the mission, vision, values, and objectives of the organization and are carried out through every day decisions, behaviors, and actions.
Use the below ten questions to evaluate your current leader performance evaluation system and determine if the systems of accountability you have in place will be helpful in achieving and sustaining the organizations operational outcomes across all strategic priorities.
|
Does every leader have a clear understanding of the 4 to 8 measurable outcomes he or she must accomplish to receive a good evaluation? |
Yes/No |
|
With your current evaluation system can a leader not meet goals and receive good evaluation? |
Yes/No |
|
Are all the leader evaluations aligned to and cascaded from the 10 to 15 annual goals of the organization? |
Yes/No |
|
Are all leaders goals based on measurable outcomes - (no completion goals, projects, or tasks)? |
Yes/No |
|
Are each of your leaders' 4 to 8 goals effectively prioritized as a percentage (at least 10% each) of the total evaluation? |
Yes/No |
|
Are goals written in a common, language that is meaningful (Patient Fall Rate, Infection rate versus actual number of events)? |
Yes/No |
|
Are the goals set aggressively to move organizational performance? |
Yes/No |
|
Are leaders' goals realistic and relevant to their role (each goal is something a leader can influence or control)? |
Yes/No |
|
Are there clear, predetermined consequences for leader who do not achieve goals? |
Yes/No |
|
Do the leaders review their progress with achieving their goals regularly (at least quarterly) with their immediate supervisor? |
Yes/No |
Our research indicates that high performing organizations, those that have clearly defined aggressive organizational goals that consistently meet or exceed them, typically answer yes to all the above questions. Leaders who answer yes to 8 to 9 questions typically reflect organizations with clearly defined aggressive organizational goals that consistently meet or exceed 50 - 75 percent of the goals. Those organizations who typically answer yes to 7 or less reflect organizations who achieve 50 - 75 percent of the relatively modest goals set.
BLG would be pleased to assist you with the creation, integration, and execution of a formal leader performance management system in your organization based on clearly-defined objective, measurable goals, as well as observable behaviors aligned to your critical success factors.
If you would like to learn more about accountability and productivity management or the automated solution, Leader Performance System, to efficiently and effectively implement this balanced approach to performance management within your organization, please contact Joseph McCrory at 850.377.1862 or
josephm@bhclg.com.
3. How do we make certain that all leaders are rounding on patients within our organization?
One of they key tactics that healthcare leaders and staff utilize is rounding. While we all agree that rounding is not a new concept, and has been used effectively for years to meet the needs of the patient, what we have begun to understand is that rounding is critical to delivering patient centered care and driving quality outcomes.
Why is this important? High patient-satisfaction scores, which are now openly available to the market, are a key driver of the perception of quality and customer service for hospitals. Empowered healthcare consumers, and often their physicians, are accessing this data to make care decisions. Think about how many employees drive performance on HCAHPS (the only national survey measuring patient perceptions). In high-performing hospitals, the employees ability to impact the patient experience, quality outcomes and the bottom line are publicly acknowledged highlights.
Rounding helps the leader to be proactive by assessing needs and levels of service, and then an action plan can be developed to change results. Rounding observations are taken back to individual departments and result in reward and recognition of staff as well as actionable steps to improve service to staff and patients. Rounding also provides a great opportunity for the leaders in these departments to harvest the wins.
4. What if the patient doesnt tell you when they are dissatisfied while they are in the hospital? How can you impact and improve their level of satisfaction?
Discharge phone calls are a quality-related tactic that, when executed consistently and effectively, provide a direct impact on outcomes and patient satisfaction. Every patient must receive a discharge phone call within 24 to 48 hours of leaving the hospital. This phone call provides two very important benefits.
First, it gives us the ability to assess the patients progress, their compliance with clinical instructions, and allows us to monitor potential warning signs. In most cases the calls help trigger early intervention, reduce adverse effects, and prevent unnecessary readmission into the hospital. In the case of uncompensated care, while the goal is clinical quality, the impact on the bottom line is direct.
Second, the phone call gives caregivers and their leaders a vehicle to learn about and understand each patients hospital experience. Most patients are more likely to give honest feedback and share negative experiences after they have left the hospital. Negative experiences can be shared with the appropriate service recovery tactics administered within the 24 to 48 hour window of discharge. Then, experiences can then be documented and shared with staff and leaders to develop action plans to improve service excellence, which has direct connectivity to patient satisfaction and profitability.
5. What does Baptist Leadership Group do, and how are you different from other firms?
Baptist Leadership Group (BLG) is a professional services firm owned by Baptist Health Care, that is dedicated to patient-centered excellence. We have a three-fold mission:
- Develop and validate evidence-based practices and tools for improving levels of performance, with an emphasis on leader productivity (via our framework for goal-setting, alignment and accountability management), employee and physician engagement, and patient satisfaction/safety.
- Share our research and best practices in a way that drives improved leader engagement and organizational outcome (via publications, conferences, and webinars).
- Partner with other healthcare organizations to help them improve (via customized engagements for coaching, skills transfer, and implementation of software accelerators).
BLG is unique, and different from other firms in several key ways:
- We are part of a world-class health care system. This means we have our own learning lab to develop and proof our tools and best practices. This also gives us the opportunity to leverage key leaders and staff with our clients, who are experts in their areas, and live what they coach each day. This expertise and walk-the-talk credibility makes for more meaningful, shoulder-shoulder coaching with our partner facilities.
- Each of our client partnership engagements is unique, and reflects a given organizations goals, resources, and journey point. There is nothing canned in our approach.
- We guarantee our work via systematic use of client scorecards that track performance improvement from our work. Each of our clients is treated as a partner, so their goals are our goals, and we are as accountable as they are for meeting targeted outcomes. Example goals include patient satisfaction, staff satisfaction/turnover, LWBS, operating margin, physician satisfaction, infection reduction, and reduction in unnecessary re-admits.
- Since we have distilled what works and how to best sequence key tools and practices, we can typically accelerate client results, thus reducing engagement fees from those of other firms.